Monday 5 March 2018

Audio-Technica ATH-M50x Review

Great sound and comfort make the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x a smash

Buy here

Key Features

Price: Aprox.₹8000
40mm dynamic driver
Three interchangeable cables included

What are the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x?

The Audio-Technica ATH-M50x are the consumer follow-up to the ATH-M50, a pair of headphones designed for the pros that proved so popular with normal folk it seemed silly not to make a slightly more friendly edition.

This new pair isn’t much more expensive than the original, selling for under ₹9000 online, and gets you interchangeable cables and the same great sound that made the original set so popular. If you’re out for portable headphones and don’t mind them being a little large, you’d be remiss not to consider the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x.

Design and Comfort

The Audio-Technica ATH-M50x are large over-ear headphones, which are generally much bigger than the kind of style-driven on-ear headphones you see at this price. While they are more a rival to the Beats Studio than the cheaper Beats Solo 2, they cost a good deal less than either.

It’s refreshing to see a pair of high-quality portable headphones designed for normal people that cost less than ₹9000 ($150). Some of you might think spending more than ₹6000 ($100) on headphones is madness, but you’ll have to trust us: you’re getting a pretty good deal here.
Check the current price here

The Audio-Technica ATH-M50x’s pro audio roots are still pretty clear, though. Where many style headphones try to look sleek, and put expensive-feeling materials like aluminium and leather near your fingertips, these are largely – and unashamedly – plastic.

There’s a little ring of metal inlaid into the ear cups, and the headband is reinforced with a band of steel. But the look is “I’m here, deal with it” rather than being desperate to please.

Buy here
Taking this style into account, the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x look is actually pretty good. While big, the earcups don’t stick out miles from the side of your head, and neither does the headband (although it is beefy). Audio-Technica has not made any major changes to the look in making this more wide-reaching version of the original M50s.

The one big difference is that the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x, like most new full-size headphones, have a removable cable. While the socket is a standard 2.5mm affair, there’s a twist-to-lock mechanism that means you wont simply just be able to use any 2.5mm cable.


However, you shouldn’t really need to as you get a very generous three cables in the box. There’s one 1.2m cable for portable use and two longers (coiled, straight) one for use at home, in the studio, in the DJ booth: whatever is your bag. There’s no iOS remote, but then the cable is much thicker than the type that normally has one.

We find these headphones fantastically versatile. As well as having the cabling for both portable and at-home use, they have the comfort for both situations too.

Using much larger ear pads than, for example, the Sennheiser Momentum gives your earlobes plenty of room, and the headband successfully spreads the pressure over your head. The Audio-Technica ATH-M50x have a mid-firm grip on your head that we think most people will find no problem with thanks to the expansive earpads.

Buy here
Like most other headphones with a hint of DJ style, the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x also fold up for extra portability. As long as you don’t need headphones that are tiny or as slick-looking as an iPhone 5S, the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x are excellent.

There’s just one practical – and slightly surprising – issue with the hardware. Noise isolation is just OK, where big over-ears headphones like this often excel in this area. We’re not entirely sure why – it may be simply down to there being not all that much between your ear and the outside world bar the driver and the relatively thin layer of plastic that makes up the back of the ear cup.

It’s disappointing, but is really one of the few elements we would tweak if we could.



Sound Quality

The Audio-Technica ATH-M50x offer sound we think will appeal to an extremely wide audience. And that’s not an insult.

They offer the bass power, the low-end beefiness, that virtually all headphones seem to aspire to these days, but match it with the control, the expansiveness and the separation that stops it from clogging the sound up.


At the price, the kind of breadth of sound on offer here is very rare in a closed-back headphone. Actual width of soundstage is naturally bettered by an open-back pair – by something like the Sennheiser HD 598 – but comparing like-for-like, the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x do extremely well.

Add to this a detailed-but-smooth treble and you have headphones that sound lively and exciting, while having enough of the high-end flavour to satisfy those with discerning ears. It’s a winning combo that deserves to win the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x much more mainstream recognition than they get at present.
Buy here

We do still think they’re better at listening for enjoyment rather than the more professional applications the original ATH-M50 were often associated with. Here’s the thing – there is a bit too much bass going on here than is strictly accurate. We found that it only really detracted from the actual listening experience with spoken-word stuff (audiobooks, anyone?).

There is some of the low-end resonance you get in a bassy headphone with lone voices, although with music the sense of scale and separation here is great enough to ensure that the bass emphasis doesn’t trample over everything else.

And, boy, does it make listening to music fun. As well as bringing extra power, bass depth is great too. This is particularly useful for gaming and movies, where deep bass adds extra impact to action scenes.


Should I buy the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x?

Buy here
In the last couple of years we’ve reviewed a lot of style headphones. Some good, plenty not so good. The Audio-Technica ATH-M50x show that you generally get a lot more bang for your buck from something a bit more traditional.


At the price the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x wipe the floor with most rivals, and offer a pretty good alternative to headphones twice the price like the Sennheiser Momentum.

Pros

Powerful bass
Good stereo imaging and separation
Great value among peers

Cons

Bass is somewhat overemphasised
Isolation could be better


Verdict

Great sound and good comfort make the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x a smash. Isolation could be better, but they come highly recommended regardless.

➖➖➖➖➖
Subscribe my YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/c/gulshanstechworld

Sunday 25 February 2018

NIKON D3400 Camera for beginners

Nikon D3400 Review


Buy Here

Key Features

•24MP APS-C CMOS sensor

•11-point phase detect auto-focus system

•1080/60p video capability

•Fixed 3" 920k-dot LCD screen

•5/fps burst shooting

•Bluetooth LE for image transfer


The D3400 is a very modestly updated version of the D3300. It's an entry level DSLR targeted toward first-time ILC shooters and those who are ready to move on from their smartphones to a more advanced shooting platform.

The camera is built around the same 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor found in its predecessor along with an 'EXPEED 4' image processor, Full HD video capture and an 11-point autofocus system. Unfortunately the camera doesn't have Wi-Fi, but it does have Bluetooth LE connectivity for transferring images from the camera to a smart phone via the 'SnapBridge' app.

Body and Handling

Buy Here

Being that this is an entry level DSLR it's not that surprising that the body mostly comprises a composite plastic material. There is a slight difference in weight between the D3400 and its predecessor, but the differences are going to be hard to decipher. The bottom line is that this camera is light, extremely light. This makes shooting it for long periods of time actually fairly enjoyable.


The various shooting modes are located on the mode dial. There's also an exposure compensation button (that also toggles the rear control dial to change aperture) The camera features a 3" LCD screen and a very easy to use control layout on the back of the camera. As you can see there are no dedicated ISO or aperture controls.
Buy Here

Nikon decided to go with a very simple control design that will be well suited for first time DSLR shooters. We found the location of the controls made choosing settings on the fly fairly easy and manageable. Switching to the 'full auto' modes is made simple with the use of the well labeled mode dial. If you're a more advanced shooter the omission of a dedicated button to adjust the ISO or a second dial to control the aperture made shooting the camera in 'manual' mode a bit frustrating.

For first time DSLR users this isn't going to be a huge problem since they are more likely to be using a number of the 'Auto' settings, but if they're looking to purchase this camera as a stepping stone to grow more as a photographer, they may be a bit problematic and may become a growing point of frustration over time.

The D3400 offers the same optical viewfinder found in the D3300 with 95% coverage and 0.85x magnification which makes composing shots fairly simple, although these figures mean the viewfinder itself is a bit on the small side. The camera also offers Live-View via the 3" LCD screen but it's important to note the screen doesn't offer touch control and since it's fixed, it can make shooting in tough lighting conditions a bit challenging.


The camera does come equipped with a built in flash, but it is really quite sensitive and seemed to fire in 'auto' mode even when it wasn't needed. If you're a first time DSLR user this might be a point of confusion if the flash decides to fire when you're in fairly well lit conditions. Switching to the 'no flash' mode on the control dial seemed to be the best option when shooting in well lit areas. The flash is also a good deal weaker in the D3400 compared to its predecessor. The flash is rated at 7m at an ISO 100 as opposed to the 12m seen in the D3300.

Autofocus

Buy Here

The D3400 offers the same 11-point phase detection autofocus system with one cross-type point that was found in the D3300. The focusing acquisition speed is fairly quick, though it does slow down a bit in live-view. The AF 'dots' in the viewfinder are fairly difficult to see; it would have been nice if the AF points were illuminated by boxes when focus is acquired. The small illuminated dots made it difficult at times to shoot with 100% degree of confidence that your shots were actually in focus.

 That being said selecting the AF points using the four-way controller and choosing the AF modes with the press of a button make using the AF very easy, especially if you are new to shooting a DSLR. The auto focus acquisition speed is pretty quick in good light with the kit lens, slowing down a bit in darker conditions, but never becoming unreasonably slow.

Live-View AF

Buy Here

The auto-focus motor in the new 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 VR kit lens has seen an upgrade from the previous version. It now offers faster and smoother focusing in live-view and while shooting video where the focusing acquisition speed is a good deal faster thanks to the upgraded kit-lens. It is worth noting, though, that focusing in live-view is still quite a bit slower than focusing through the viewfinder and the AF can also be prone to hunting while attempting to acquire focus.

All-out focus failures were rare, though in less-than-ideal light, using the focus points toward the center turned in more consistently sharp photos in live-view.

The one large downside to the D3400 is the lack of a touch screen. Some of its mirrorless competitors offer touch-to-focus capability, face detection, 20x as many focus points, greater focusing area, and faster focusing in live view will likely provide for a much smoother transition from something like an iPhone to a more advanced shooting platform.

Image Quality


Buy Here

The D3400 offers some very punchy, yet pleasing JPEGs right out of the box. The sharpening, even if you engage the optional 'fine' setting, is fairly reserved, but the detail that's possible with the 24MP sensor is really quite nice.


Nikkor AF-P 18-55mm F3.5-5.6G, 34mm, 1/250, F8, ISO 100


One really nice feature that was found on the D3300 and now the D3400 is Active D-Lighting, or ADL. It's a JPEG-only feature that works to retain shadow and protect highlight details, within 1-stop, that are often lost when strong lighting creates big differences between bright and dark areas of an image.
Buy Here

When ADL or Active D-Lighting is engaged the camera's metering system will pick a perfectly nice exposure in almost any situation. If a light-source is particularly bright the camera will slightly reduce the expose to protect the highlights, then will boost shadows and midtones to give a well balanced image.


The D3400 produces some very nice JPEGs. The Active D-lighting metering worked very well in this dimly lit shot. This image was taken by Carey Rose with the new Nikkor AF-P 18-55mm F3.5-5.6G lens.

If you're shooting Raw the D3400's dynamic range will allow you to recover shadows in most cases. This fact alone makes it an excellent camera for new or beginner photographers. And, although the processing aspect of Active D-Lighting only affects the JPEGs, the adjusted metering to protect most highlight detail, is still a benefit for Raw shooters.


Since the camera is capable of Raw capture, exposing to protect the highlights will give you much more flexibility in post processing to bring back the shadow detail in your images. The D3400's 24MP sensor has some very impressive dynamic range that offers a great deal of latitude in terms of post processing.

It is worth noting that, by default, Nikon's JPEG engine tends to muddle a bit more of the fine detail in the process than we'd ideally like, something that becomes more obvious around ISO 3200. Toning down the camera's noise reduction settings will yield sharper, albeit noisier, images when shooting at higher ISOs.


SnapBridge

Buy Here

Although the the D3400 doesn't have Wi-Fi one fairly big difference between it and its predecessor is the addition of the always-connected SnapBridge system. The D3400's version of SnapBridge is a Bluetooth LE-based and is primarily used for sharing images to your smartphone. After downloading the App it takes a few minutes to sync the camera's Bluetooth up with your phone's, following the steps and pressing 'OK' several times on both the camera and phone.


SnapBridge is designed to automatically transfer every image as you shoot it (unless you're shooting Raw only). Alternatively you can select which images to transfer, either from the camera or from the smartphone. You can also sync time and location data from your phone, if you wish. However, unlike the D500, you can't use the app to shoot remotely.

Through the App you can browse the images on the camera's memory card. The previews can be generated in different sizes and you can scroll through and make your image transfer selections directly through your phone. However, if you have a number of files on your memory card it will take some time for the previews to load in the App. We found it was quicker and easier to select the images on the camera, then press the 'i' button to select them for transfer.


However, the only way to transfer full resolution images it to select them from the smartphone. And, when we did manually transfer these full resolution images, we'd regularly get the message that 'To reduce the time required, download will begin when there is more bandwidth available,' despite the camera being the only thing demanding Bluetooth bandwidth from the phone.

File transfer times will vary, depending upon the file sizes and the quantity of the JPEGs you are transferring, but we found the 2MP files transferred pretty quickly.


Video

Buy Here

The D3400 offers the same Full HD 1080/60p video spec seen in the D3300, which had some very nice quality video with lots of detail and smooth frame rate. The moire issues that were found in the D3300 have largely been minimized in the D3400, this is particularly evident in our video stills comparison widget.

The auto-focus issues seen during video recording in the D3300 have been largely resolved as the AF speed has increased a great deal, though it is still slower in live-view than through the viewfinder. Provided that your subject has a high contrast edge and doesn't move too erratically, subject tracking with full-time AF works fairly well. It's worth noting, though, that there is the risk that the focus will jump off into the distance and ruin your footage,

so it's not your best bet for critical video recording. One fairly significant improvement made to the video sound quality in the D3400 is thanks to the upgraded AF motor in the kit lens, which is now a great deal quieter and smoother.

D3400 Price

Pros

•Simple control layout

•Lightweight camera body

•Very nice JPEGs

•Excellent battery life (CIPA rated 1200 shots)

•Nice Dynamic Range in Raw files

•Detailed, smooth 1080/60p HD video

•Updated kit lenses


CONs

•Cheap-feeling body

•No built in sensor cleaning

•Slow live-view autofocus

•Limited AF coverage

•No touch or articulating LCD screen

•Flash activates when it's not needed in 'auto' mode

•Weaker strength flash rated for 7m

•No secondary control dial for easy access to aperture and ISO settings



Overall Conclusion


The D3400 left a bit to be desired considering that this is supposed to be an updated version of the D3300. With the removal of the in-body sensor cleaning and the external mic port we expected there to be a few more updates to the D3400 and, well, we just didn't get them.

The D3400's limitations are made even more apparent when compared to the competition.


 There are a number of mirrorless options on the market like the Sony a5100 and the Fujifilm X-A3 that offer more AF coverage, better AF subject tracking, additional features and comparable overall image quality.

That being said it's still a very solid performer with a 24MP sensor that still offers some very nice image quality for the money. The JPEGs have pleasing, yet punchy colors with nice detail and the Raws offer a fair amount of latitude with respect to Dynamic Range, especially for an APS-C sensor.

Buy one for yourself
From Here

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Subscribe my YouTube channel @
Gulshan Tech World

Monday 19 February 2018

SoundMagic E50 Earphone Worth it or Not???

What are the SoundMagic E50?


Buy Here

The SoundMagic E50 are in-ear headphones at a price where buds like these start to get serious. They cost ₹2499($55), and are essentially a grown-up version of the classic SoundMagic E10. For years, that pair has been widely considered one of the best budget sets you can get.For the extra $25 you get much-improved sound balance, greater accuracy and less of the bonus bass thickness you get with the cheaper set.


SoundMagic E50 – Design and features


Buy Here

SoundMagic doesn’t make the most beautiful of headphones. They often get the look a little bit wrong, labelling things too clearly and looking less slick than the sort of designs you get from companies such as Sony.

However,
the SoundMagic E50 are a bit better than the SoundMagic standard. They use aluminium shells pretty similar to those of the E10, but have a simple silver and black colour scheme that avoids the awkward-looking blue and red signposting of L/R sides used in some of the company’s other pairs.


They’re still not beauties, but they’re better. The SoundMagic E50 also have an odd cable, with a weaved structure rather than the usual flat style.

Does it make much difference? It’s not very tangle-prone, but the cable does cause quite a lot of microphonic noise when the cable brushes up against your clothing.


Ofcourse, microphonic noise is also a sign that your headphones have a pretty good seal with your ears, and that also generally means decent sound isolation. The SoundMagic E50 offer fairly decent isolation, as we expect from a set of IEMs.

Buy Here

What the SoundMagic E50 do a bit different from some rivals is that, as well as a remote, they have a little switch that alters the connection to suit certain phone types that just don’t get along with some remote headphones. We’ve occasionally had problems in the past with Samsung and Windows phones that sound essentially broken when used with some headphones, needing an adapter to fix the issue. No such thing is needed here.

Other than that, though, these are pretty standard earphones. No wireless, no cancellation, no other fancy bits.

The cable is also non-removable, although it’s not often you see a pair of in-ears at this price offer such a cable style.

SoundMagic E50: Sound quality

So far, we’ve not seen many compelling reasons to buy the SoundMagic E50.

Buy Here

They’re not beauties, and aside from the compatibility switch, they’re pretty much bog-standard mid-range in-ears.

However, as so often with SoundMagic, it’s the sound that matters. These are among the cheapest headphones to take sound balance and accuracy really seriously,cutting out the low-frequency and mid-range bloat that’s poured over so many lower-cost headphones like custard on apple pie.


The SoundMagic E50 are, for the price, remarkably well-balanced earphones.

Buy Here

It’s clear that serious work has gone into their tuning, pulling from a single dynamic driver the sort of tone we hear more often from balanced armature headphones. This is another kind of driver, one that generally appears in more expensive, more “hi-fi” pairs.

These are very measured-sounding, with no obvious spikes in the bass or treble. As such they’re the perfect introduction to the dangerously-addictive world of hearphones if you don’t want to spend a good idea of cash on a multi-driver set.


Ofcourse, this also means they’re a bit lower on thrills than some. We like the bass as it’s very well integrated and doesn’t bloom out at all,but its presence is relatively subtle. If you’re after rib-rattling bass, stay away. They are also not very warm, and may sound a little clinical and ‘small’ compared with the bassier Sennheiser CX 3.00 and CX 5.00 you might find more often on the high street.

Buy Here

They don’t try to charm your ears with the musical equivalent of melted chocolate either. While there’s no sense of particular harshness to the sound, it lacks a little softer-touch refinement, particularly in the mid-range.

They don’t try to charm your ears with whatever you’re listening to – music is delivered as a matter-of-fact statement that comes across as sticking to a certain set of sound principle, not what might make you enjoy the music the most.

If that sounds like nonsense, think of it like this: these are not ear candy headphones, so if you want smooth-as-silk sounds, you may be better off with something a little more complementary. Funnily enough, SoundMagic actually released a slightly less rigorous version of this same ideal a few years ago, with the pretty terrific SoundMagic E30. They’re ultimately slightly less serious, but smoother-sounding headphones. Look around and you should still be able to find a pair.


Should I buy the SoundMagic E50?


Buy Here

TheSoundMagic E50 are headphones to look for if you want to stay away from the cheap tricks of other entry-level or mid-range headphones in favour of something a bit more serious, grounded and accurate.

If you find most headphones and earphones too bassy, and don’t like an overly warm sound, these are for you. They also make a good step forwards if you’re a SoundMagic E10 owner after something a little more accurate.

However,
they’re not for everyone. Listening side-by-side with the Sennhesier LCX 5.00, the low-warmth E50 can sound a little narrow and non-expressive.



Pros

Balanced and accurate sound

Smart compatibilty switch

Good value


Cons

Lacks a little smoothness


Key Features

Woven cable

In-line handsfree remote

Aluminium housings


Verdict

Accurate earphones for those after serious sound who are willing to trade away cheap thrills.
BuyHere
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Subscribe my YouTube channel @
GULSHAN'S Tech World